...
Abstract
The core principles of collecting good quality data from site for creating CCTV inspection reports including some explanations of how to avoid common mistakes.
...
| Page Tree | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
...
The PLR Naming Convention
Most global drainage inspection standards include a system for naming pipes based on either the upstream manhole ID or a combination of both the upstream and downstream manhole IDs. The Manual of Sewer Condition Classification (MSCC) defines the naming convention for WRc pipe and sewer inspection using the Pipe Length Reference (PLR) system at all times:
...
How do we avoid problems like this? The simple solution is to use unique IDs for every node point on your site sketch regardless of whether it is a manhole, catchpit, gully, rainwater pipe or anything else. There is no specified way to do this, but a simple and robust technique is to use a few letters and a number which additionally describe the use of the asset (i.e. foul water, surface water or combined) and its type, like this:
Node Type | Foul Water ID | Surface Water ID | Combined Use ID |
|---|---|---|---|
Manhole | FWMH1, FWMH2 etc | SWMH1, SWMH2 etc | CWMH1, CWMH2 etc |
Inspection Chamber | FWIC1, FWIC2 etc | SWIC1, SWIC2 etc | CWIC1, CWIC2 etc |
Gully | FWG1, FWG2 etc | SWG1, SWG2 etc | CWG1, CWG2 etc |
Yard Gully | - | YG1, YG2 etc | - |
Road Gully | - | RG1, RG2 etc | - |
Soil & Vent Pipe | SVP1, SVP2 etc | - | - |
Rain Water Pipe | - | RWP1, RWP2 etc | - |
Catchpit | - | CP1, CP2 etc | - |
Soakaway | FWSK1, FWSK etc | SWSK1, SWSK2 etc | CWSK1, CWSK2 etc |
Rodding Eye | FWRE1, FWRE2 etc | SWRE1, SWRE2 etc | CWRE1, CWRE2 etc |
Fresh Air Inlet | FAI1, FAI2 etc | FAI1, FAI2 etc | FAI1, FAI2 etc |
Ground Floor Toilet | WC1, WC2 etc | - | - |
Lamphole | FWLH1, FWLH2 etc | SWLH1, SWLH2 etc | CWLH1, CWLH3 etc |
Septic Tank | ST1, ST2 etc | - | - |
Cess Pit | CE1, CE2 etc | - | - |
Grease Trap | GT1, GT2 etc | - | - |
Petrol/Oil Interceptor | PI1, PI2 etc | PI1, PI2 etc | PI1, PI2 etc |
Connector Node | CN1, CN2 etc | CN1, CN2 etc | CN1, CN2 etc |
Outfall | - | OF1, OF2 etc | OF1, OF2 etc |
Inlet | - | IN1, IN2 etc | - |
Unknown | UKN1, UKN2 etc | UKN1, UKN2 etc | UKN1, UKN2 etc |
This list can be extended or modified as required by the user because it is only a suggestion for a simple and robust naming convention that is easy to follow and is informative. It should be remembered that the upstream and downstream node ID fields in the WRc reporting in WinCan VX only allow for 10 characters maximum. The reasons for this are because the manhole naming convention described in Appendix A of the MSCC only require 10 characters to name any manhole in the country, and the xml data format exchange file also limits this field to 10 characters. This naming convention is described in detail in Understanding STC25 Manhole References.
...
This works well in Infonet and helps with connectivity analysis, but there is no concept of this in the WRc MSCC data stream which is why using this value to create PLRs is not recommended.
...
Good Site Drawings
Everything described above regarding avoiding problems with data in software applications can be avoided by taking care and time to create good quality site drawings. The process described here considers a domestic CCTV inspection but the recommended logical approach can be extended to any type of CCTV inspection.
...
That’s it, your job as a CCTV surveyor is complete provided that the video files and data that you have recorded on your CCTV camera match up with this drawing. Based on the information reported here, the office rehab manager can either go with your recommendations or create their own, but regardless of which way they go, they have enough information in the video files, pictures and (most importantly) the very good site sketch to make all the good and proper quotations needed for this job.
...
Understanding STC25 Manhole References
It is common when working with water company asset records to see STC25 manhole references like NZ24567401 (made up example) and although this seems like a mad set of numbers and letters, the way these are constructed is actually quite simple and is described in Appendix A of the MSCC.
...
To understand the STC25 reference, we must split it up into its 6 constituent parts:
NZ 24 56 7 4 01
NZ = the 100km grid tile that you are currently in as described and specified by the Ordnance Survey. Remember 100km = 100,000 metres.
24 = the 24th kilometre across the NZ box from the bottom left corner starting at 00.
56 = the 58th kilometre up the NZ box from the bottom left corner starting at 00.
7 = the 7th 100m segment across the km grid square starting at 00.
4 = the 4th 100m segment up the km grid square starting at 00.
01 = numeric counter as described previously.
...
OS grid tiles.
From this, we can deduce that the NZ 100km grid tile is in the North East of England, and if we count 24Km East from the bottom-left corner of the tile and 56Km North from the bottom-left corner of the tile, then we hit the red cross:
...
This means that with HADDMS numbering, we are focusing down to a 10m grid rather than a 100m grid and a typical HADDMS node reference might typically look like NZ2456_7348a where:
NZ 24 56 _ 73 48 a
NZ = the 100km grid tile that you are currently in as described and specified by the Ordnance Survey. Remember 100km = 100,000 metres.
24 = the 24th kilometre across the NZ box from the bottom left corner starting at 00.
56 = the 58th kilometre up the NZ box from the bottom left corner starting at 00.
_ = fixed text character.
73 = the 73rd 10m segment across the km grid square starting at 00.
48 = the 48th 10m segment up the km grid square starting at 00.
a = alpha node counter inside this 10m grid.
As a point of interest, and if the standard character lengths allowed it, we could specify a 1m grid on the ground using a manhole reference like NZ2456734854a, so this can be achieved with only 13 characters. The chances of there being more than 1 drainage asset plotted in a 1m grid square are extremely low, but possible. It is common to see double gullies side-by-side on the inner ring of roundabouts where the road surface level is angles downwards in towards the centre of the roundabout.
...